The 7 Year Stitch | Blogs from the Archives

  1. Contrast:

The 7 Year Stitch

A bright green leaflet cover with the words

For a business which was only existence for just over 50 years the London Hospital Ligature Department had a remarkable impact on suturing as well as medical marketing.

Three examples of marketing materials produced by London Hospital Ligature Department. The first is a mocked-up image of a snapped glass phial with shards of glass under the words “London Hospital announce the last of the glass phials” in orange letters. The second is an image of the phrase “see what we mean?” behind see through plastic packet of suture material which is visible through the packet, underneath the words “London Hospital announce the new suture pack” in brown letters. The third is a photo of a cardboard box of sutures on a brown background, above is written “First we develop the new see-through suture pack” and below is written “then we hide it away” with some smaller text about the new dispensing system.

The London Hospital Ligature Department developed, manufactured, and marketed surgical catgut sutures. Despite the name, catgut is made from purified collagen taken from the small intestine of ruminants (animals such as cows and sheep) – the Ligature Department used lamb. Catgut sutures offered flexibility and strength, and were absorbed by the body during healing.

The Department was set up in 1919 in response to declining availability of suture stocks, in part caused by the First World War. A high quality, home-grown, option was sought and so the Governors of the London Hospital invited their staff to investigate the possibility of manufacturing suture material.

One of those invited to investigate developing in-house suture production was Henry Morley. As a theatre assistant at the London Hospital he had witnessed the devastating effects of poor quality or non-sterile sutures. Morley developed a manufacturing process which was adopted by the Hospital, pilot production began in 1918. By 1919 twenty, predominantly women, staff were employed producing catgut sutures using the London Hospital’s name and the slogan “Morley’s process”.

Other hospitals put in orders, and Allen & Hanbury’s Ltd, a leading medical supplies supplier was selected as the sole distributor. On 23 June 1922 the London Hospital Ligature Department Ltd. was incorporated.

A black and white photograph showing the shop window of Allen & Hanbury’s Ltd London. The shop front with glass cabinets stocked with packets of sutures, flowers, union flags, and photos of the London Hospital catgut manufacturing process.

The growth in orders meant that extra production facilities’ were added at Glasshouse Fields in Stepney in 1933, employing 300 additional staff. The business’ turnover, domestic and export, was equivalent to about 20% of the London Hospital’s entire income and was outselling its main UK competitor.

In the early days the department developed a distinctive branding, making use of the prestigious London Hospital name, and emphasising being a home-grown, British product. When the company’s primary retailer, Allen & Hanbury’s, was taken over by pharma giant Glaxo in 1958 LHC was forced to manage its own marketing and sales. The company’s sales representatives operated nationally and internationally to scope appetite for the sutures. Their reports influenced production and marketing decisions, such as the move to plastic packaging and the use of dispensers. LHC’s marketing distinguished them from their competitors, but the company made sure to keep a close eye on their work by collecting and analysing the competitors’ brochures and adverts.

Competing manufacturers’ Dexon and Ethicon marketing brochures, including a booklet (opened to a page) of ‘suturegrams’ which is a colourful illustrated guide to suturing wounds.

As with most medical marketing the safety of products is put front and foremost. Because catgut was an animal product there was the risk of contamination and infection. In one instance a patient had died after contracting tetanus from tainted catgut which was reported to have been London Hospital Catgut. In response London Hospital Governor Arthur Elliott wrote a letter to the British Medical Journal to defend the company from what he described as damaging and false accusations that the contaminated sutures were London Hospital.

To assure the sterility of their catgut the Ligature Department photographed the manufacturing process. These photos emphasise the sterile working conditions of the production – the workers wore scrubs and masks, worked at sterile benches, and demonstrate the use of autoclaves and iodine to sterilise the sutures and production equipment.

Four black and white mounted photographs, in a grid pattern, showing the process for making catgut at the London Hospital laboratory. The top left image shows two workers wearing white PPE handling a frozen block of lamb intestines in a sink of water. The top right image shows a group of workers, wearing white PPE, standing at a work table handling fine strands of catgut over small ceramic trays. The bottom left image shows a worker, wearing white PPE, standing at a work table attaching and wrapping strands of catgut around wooden pegs. The bottom right image shows two workers seated at a work table which is covered in a white cloth, beneath a glass hood.

Another element of the Ligature Department’s branding was the ‘British-ness’ of their product. In 1916 a letter appeared in the British Medical Journal expressing concern that the market was flooded with “German and American produce” when it would be preferable to “keep the trade within the empire”. LHC posters sold the catgut as an “achievement of modern British research made entirely by British labour”. Adverts were produced, “for the British empire and abroad”, using traditional British imagery and connecting the product back to the prestigious London Hospital.

A black and white poster advertising London Hospital Catgut. The background image is of the old BBC building with lightning bolts coming out of the radio transmitters. At the top of the poster the word ‘dependability’ is spelt out in capitals, with the tag line “Britain’s millions rely on the BBC time signal. Surgeons throughout the world rely on London Hospital Catgut.” At the bottom of the poster is an illustration of two glass phials of catgut alongside a paragraph which reads “London Hospital catgut is an achievement of modern British research made entirely by British labour”.

Proving that the sutures were the best on the market was one thing, proving innovation in the field was another. In 1921, to accompany the London Hospital developed catgut, Henry Souttar, director of the London Hospital Surgical Unit, developed an eyeless needle (a needle with a tubular ending into which the catgut was fixed) which made smaller holes when suturing skin.

In the late 1940s the progress of the Ligature Department stumbled, being unable to meet the demands of the post-war market. Orders were running at about double production levels. Despite new purpose built laboratories, London Hospital Catgut was unable to keep up with advancements in product development. They still enclosed their suture products in glass whereas their main competitor, Ethicon, was now offering sutures wrapped in “theatre safe” plastic foil. Ethicon also was in the process of opening an irradiation plant to better sterilise their goods, whilst the Ligature Department was still using chemical based sterilisation.

An open white cardboard box containing three candy-cane shaped glass phials each containing catgut suture material and a curved needle. Propped behind the open box is the box lid which shows the blue branding of the London Hospital and text explaining that the catgut was made using ‘Morley’s Process’.

London Hospital Catgut was manufactured in small glass phials which could either be sawn open using a small file, or snapped in the middle to release the sutures from within. However there were numerous reports in the BMJ of surgeons receiving glass splinters when snapping open the phials and injuring themselves and patients. So, less revolutionary and a little too late, was the development of plastic packaging. This packaging was easier to use during surgery, and safer for surgeons and patients. However, by the time London Hospital Catgut put their product on the market Ethicon had already had their plastic packaging available for more than five years.

A white and grey cardboard box for dispensing London Hospital ligature packets. Next to the box is a green leaflet with the words “7 Year Stitch” at the top, and a second leaflet which shows an image of the phrase “see what we mean?” behind see through plastic packet of suture material which is visible through the packet, underneath the words “London Hospital announce the new suture pack” in brown letters.

The final death knell for the Department came in the form of synthetic sutures. These sutures were made from synthetic polymer and were extruded into threads. Now producers wouldn’t have to worry about the sterility of the ‘catgut’, nor the problems associated with product consistency.

After spending seven years developing a plastic pack, the product was launched in January 1970. But it was too late for London Hospital liagutures to regain market relevancy, and in August 1970 LHC was put into liquidation. Following the eruption of "Mad-Cow Disease" (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) in the 1990s Europe banned the use of catgut sutures in humans.

Explore more of the London Hospital Ligature Department records on the archive catalogue, under the reference RLHLG.

Comments

Add a response »
*

No comments yet: why not be the first to contribute?

Cookies help us deliver the best experience for you on our website. Some of them are essential, and others are there to help make it easier and more secure for you to use our site. We also use analytics cookies to help us understand how people use our website so we can make it better. If you choose not to accept these cookies, our site will still work correctly but some third party services (such as videos or social media feeds) may not display.

Please choose a setting: